Offender Profile
- Name:
- ZIETZ, RANDAL CRAIG
- Aliases:
- ZIETZ, RANDY CRAIG
- Birthdate:
- 1960
- Sex:
- MALE
- Race:
- WHITE
- Height:
-
5′
10″ - Weight:
- 160 LBS
- Eye Color:
- HAZEL
- Hair Color:
- BLOND OR STRAWBERRY
- Skin:
- LIGHT
- Registration Expiration:
- LIFETIME
- Risk Level:
- LOW
- Registration Status:
- REGISTERED
- Ethnicity:
- NON-HISPANIC OR NOT LATINO
| Observed | Category | Item/Location | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| No information available | |||
| Make | Color | Year | Plate Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| BUICK | GRAY | 1992 | 150BOR |
| BUICK | GRAY | 2004 | 842CPF |
| CHRYSLER CORPORATE | RED | 1992 | 824APX |
| DODGE CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC | BLUE | 1997 | 002BRK |
| DODGE CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC | BLUE | 1996 | 763AGX |
- Offense:
- GROSS SEXUAL IMPOSITION; 12.1-20-03
- Description:
- WHEN ZIETZ WAS 42 YEARS OLD, HE HAD SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH A 13-YEAR-OLD FEMALE.
- Conviction Date:
- 9/1/2004
- Jurisdiction & State:
- WARD COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, ND
- Disposition:
- 8 YEARS; 4 YEARS SUSPENDED FOR 5 YEARS; 5 YEARS SUPERVISED PROBATION
- Offense:
- GROSS SEXUAL IMPOSITION; 12.1-20-03
- Description:
- WHEN ZIETZ WAS 42 YEARS OLD, HE HAD SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH A 13-YEAR-OLD FEMALE.
- Conviction Date:
- 8/19/2004
- Jurisdiction & State:
- WARD COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, ND
- Disposition:
- 8 YEARS; 4 YEARS SUSPENDED; 5 YEARS SUPERVISED PROBATION
For an offense(s) committed outside the state of North Dakota, please contact the appropriate state registry who can provide you with public records law and resources in that state for obtaining additional information, if permitted.
The National Sex Offender Public Website (NSOPW) provides sex offender registry web site addresses for each state. The NSOPW web site address is: https://www.nsopw.gov/. You can obtain contact information from this site, or by conducting a search for that state registry using your search engine.
Please Note: Positive identification of a person believed to be a sexual predator or sexual offender cannot be established unless a fingerprint comparison is made, and that it is illegal to use public information regarding a registered sexual predator to facilitate the commission of a crime.