Libby Parker Erickson, 19,<\/strong> faces the charge following a report received by the Pennington County Sheriff’s Office on October 13, 2026, concerning an alleged violation two days earlier.<\/p>\n According to the criminal complaint, Erickson was served with a harassment restraining order on June 9.<\/p>\n The order prohibited her from contacting the petitioner or coming within 300 feet of the petitioner’s residence.<\/p>\n Court documents indicate the order remains effective until June 6, 2028, unless modified by a subsequent court order.<\/p>\n The alleged violation occurred October 11, when an employee was at the petitioner’s home helping with a foot dressing.<\/p>\n According to the complaint, the employee encountered Erickson inside the residence despite the restrictions outlined in the court order.<\/p>\n The employee also alleged that Erickson smoked the petitioner’s medical marijuana.<\/p>\n The employee reportedly left after Erickson’s boyfriend arrived and she overheard Erickson speaking negatively about her.<\/p>\n According to the complaint, the employee told authorities that Erickson had frequently visited the residence despite the restraining order.<\/p>\n The supplied report does not identify any separate drug-related charge arising from the employee’s allegation.<\/p>\n The criminal complaint also references Erickson’s previous adjudication of delinquency in connection with a February 2021 fourth-degree assault case in Pennington County.<\/p>\n However, the report does not establish whether the petitioner in the current restraining order case was involved in that earlier matter.<\/p>\n It also does not specify the criminal severity classification of the newly filed restraining order violation charge.<\/p>\n Under Minnesota Statute 609.748<\/a>, subdivision 6, violating a harassment restraining order can constitute a misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, or felony, depending on the circumstances.<\/p>\n Certain previous qualifying offenses or adjudications can affect the classification.<\/p>\n The available complaint summary does not identify the exact subdivision under which Erickson was charged, so the applicable offense level has not been independently established.<\/p>\n The supplied information does not include a verified criminal court file number, upcoming hearing date, or final disposition.<\/p>\n Additional public case information may be available through Minnesota Court Records Online<\/a>.<\/p>\n The charge remains an allegation. Erickson is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court.<\/p>\n I’m Adrian Cole reporting for TRF News<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\nRestraining Order Prohibited Contact<\/h2>\n
Employee Reports Encounter at Residence<\/h2>\n
Previous Juvenile Court Case Referenced<\/h2>\n
Minnesota Law on Restraining Order Violations<\/h2>\n
Court Proceedings<\/h2>\n
![\"Libby](\"https:\/\/trfnews.i234.me\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/Libby-Erickson-Charged-With-Restraining-Order-Violation-1024x1024.png\")
<\/a>