Donald Marvin Longtin faces a second-degree driving while impaired charge involving alleged test refusal.<\/p>\n
According to the criminal complaint, officers observed possible signs of impairment during the encounter.<\/p>\n
The traffic stop occurred near the intersection of Third Street and Davis Avenue.<\/p>\n
Traffic Stop Leads to DWI Arrest<\/h2>\n
Police encountered Longtin’s vehicle near Third Street and Davis Avenue on October 10.<\/p>\n
During the investigation, officers reported observing indicators that suggested Longtin might be impaired.<\/p>\n
According to the complaint, Longtin declined to participate in field sobriety testing.<\/p>\n
Officers also requested a preliminary breath test to help assess possible alcohol impairment.<\/p>\n
Longtin allegedly refused that preliminary test on two separate occasions.<\/p>\n
Following the investigation, police arrested Longtin on suspicion of driving while impaired.<\/p>\n
He was subsequently charged with second-degree DWI involving test refusal.<\/p>\n
Prior DWI Conviction Listed in Complaint<\/h2>\n
The criminal complaint also references a previous DWI conviction involving Longtin.<\/p>\n
According to the document, that conviction occurred within the past 10 years.<\/p>\n
Under Minnesota law, certain prior impaired driving convictions can increase the severity of a new DWI offense.<\/p>\n
A qualifying prior conviction within 10 years may count as an aggravating factor.<\/p>\n
The supplied complaint summary does not identify the date or details of Longtin’s earlier conviction.<\/p>\n
Understanding Second-Degree DWI Charges<\/h2>\n
Minnesota Statute 169A.25 establishes the requirements for second-degree driving while impaired.<\/p>\n
The law classifies second-degree DWI as a gross misdemeanor.<\/p>\n
A qualifying chemical test refusal involving one aggravating factor can support a second-degree DWI charge.<\/p>\n
However, a preliminary roadside breath test differs from an evidentiary chemical test.<\/p>\n
The supplied summary describes Longtin refusing preliminary testing but does not explain the separate chemical test refusal allegation.<\/p>\n
It also does not provide any blood alcohol concentration results.<\/p>\n
Readers can review Minnesota Statute 169A.25<\/a> for second-degree DWI requirements.<\/p>\n Additional information about chemical test refusal appears under Minnesota Statute 169A.20<\/a>.<\/p>\n The available report confirms that Longtin was arrested following the October 10 encounter.<\/p>\n However, it does not specify where he was taken after his arrest.<\/p>\n No scheduled court appearance, bail amount, or criminal case number was included in the supplied information.<\/p>\n The report also does not explain what initially prompted officers to investigate the vehicle.<\/p>\n Further information may become available through official court filings and hearings.<\/p>\n Readers can search the Minnesota Court Records Online portal<\/a> for publicly available case information.<\/p>\n The charge remains an allegation unless proven in court.<\/p>\n Longtin is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.<\/p>\n I’m Adrian Cole reporting for TRF News<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\nArrest and Court Proceedings<\/h2>\n
![\"Thief](\"https:\/\/trfnews.i234.me\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/Donald-Marvin-Longtin-1024x576.png\")
<\/a>