The jail roster lists six charges connected with three law enforcement agencies.<\/p>\n
The allegations include first-degree burglary, theft, identity theft, fifth-degree assault, and two traffic offenses.<\/p>\n
Langston was booked at 7:41 a.m., according to the roster.<\/p>\n
Burglary and Assault Charges<\/h2>\n
The Moorhead Police Department entry lists first-degree burglary and fifth-degree assault charges.<\/p>\n
Minnesota Statute 609.582 governs burglary offenses.<\/p>\n
First-degree burglary involves unlawful building entry under specific serious circumstances.<\/p>\n
Those circumstances can involve an occupied dwelling, a dangerous weapon, or an alleged assault.<\/p>\n
The roster does not state which circumstance applies to Langston’s charge.<\/p>\n
Readers can review Minnesota Statute 609.582<\/a>.<\/p>\n The fifth-degree assault charge is also listed without further incident details.<\/p>\n Minnesota’s basic fifth-degree assault law covers causing fear or intentionally causing bodily harm.<\/p>\n The complete law appears in Minnesota Statute 609.224<\/a>.<\/p>\n A Cass County entry lists an alleged theft involving property valued between $10,000 and $50,000.<\/p>\n The roster also describes the allegation as theft from a motor vehicle.<\/p>\n The charge is marked as a felony in the booking record.<\/p>\n Minnesota’s general theft law is available under Minnesota Statute 609.52<\/a>.<\/p>\n A second Cass County charge alleges unauthorized use of personal identifying information.<\/p>\n The roster says the alleged conduct involved obtaining more than $1,000 in credit.<\/p>\n That count is also marked as a felony.<\/p>\n Minnesota’s identity theft law is found in Minnesota Statute 609.527<\/a>.<\/p>\n Douglas County records list two additional traffic charges.<\/p>\n One alleges driving without a valid license for the vehicle class or type.<\/p>\n The other alleges speeding above the posted limit.<\/p>\n License requirements are addressed in Minnesota Statute 171.02<\/a>.<\/p>\n Speed limits are covered by Minnesota Statute 169.14<\/a>.<\/p>\n The roster does not explain whether the charges stem from related or separate incidents.<\/p>\n It does not identify the property, alleged victims, building, or circumstances behind the burglary charge.<\/p>\n Those details may appear later in criminal complaints or court filings.<\/p>\n
\n![\"Steve](\"https:\/\/trfnews.i234.me\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/LANGSTON-STEVE-ALONZO.jpg\")
\n<\/a>Steve Alonzo Langston. Clay County booking image.<\/em><\/div>\nTheft and Identity Theft Allegations<\/h2>\n
Traffic Charges Also Listed<\/h2>\n
Case Details Remain Limited<\/h2>\n