President Ronald Reagan Talks About Abortion In The 1970’s

WASHINGTON D.C. (trfnews.i234.me) An audio clip from former President Ronald Reagan on the topic of abortion in the 1970’s.

– Reagan believes that abortion is the taking of a human life
– He believes there are only two instances in which abortion is justified
– One instance is when done in self-defense
– The other instance is when a woman is raped and should not be made to bear a child resulting from that violation
– Reagan believes a woman has the right to protect her own life, even against her unborn child
– He believes a fetus is a living human being with human rights
– Not everyone agrees with his views
– This is Ronald Reagan’s stance on abortion

Ronald Reagan, former President of the United States, stated that he believed an abortion is the taking of a human life and can only be justified in two instances: when done in self-defense and when a woman has become pregnant as a result of rape. He believes that a woman should have the right to protect her own life if it is endangered, even if it means having an abortion and that a woman should not be made to bear a child resulting from rape. Reagan argues that a fetus is a living human being with human rights and while not everyone agrees with his view, he can find no evidence to suggest otherwise.

Bullet Summary:
– Reagan believes that abortion is the taking of a human life
– Abortion can only be justified in two instances: self-defense and rape
– A woman has the right to protect her own life even if it means having an abortion
– A woman should not be made to bear a child resulting from rape
– Reagan believes that a fetus is a living human being with human rights

9 comments

  1. Minnesota was the only state to not vote for Ronald Reagan. The last Republican that got our vote was Nixon and he was impeached.

  2. What would a personally autonomous woman who is capable of using her own brain to make her own choices care what St. Ronnie of RayGun said umpteen years ago? He was senile while in office in case anyone isn't old enough to remember that era. He was a man and irrelevant to the topic of abortion. He didn't have a uterus and couldn't get pregnant.

    On SCOTUS it is currently five living men and one woman who wiped out fifty years of equal rights progress and legislation. Within my lifetime women and children were once legal chattel property of the men in their lives. We mostly made enough progress to get out of that…, and now those six SCOTUS justices have put women right back into that situation. Those justices deserve to be impeached for lying to Congress at their Senate hearings before the full Senate voted to make them justices (and at least two of the men had questionable pasts involving actions against women that should have disqualified them from being considered in the first place).

    This is a very surreal time for educated and intelligent women who don't know if this is a sick experiment at setting up a world based on Gilead in "The Handmaid's Tale," or the ugly reality of Lebensborn institutions.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *